USPTO serial 76528954
PARTY POOPERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PARTY POOPERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent T. Winder
BRENT T WINDER JONES, WALDO, HOLBROOK & MCDONOUGH, PC170 S MAIN ST STE 1500SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101-1644UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | TOYS AND SPORTING GOODS, INCLUDING GAMES AND PLAYTHINGS--NAMELY, ACTION FIGURES AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR; PLUSH TOYS; BALLOONS; BATHTUB TOYS; RIDE-ON TOYS; EQUIPMENT SOLD AS A UNIT FOR PLAYING CARD GAMES; TOY VEHICLES; DOLLS; FLYING DISCS; ELECTRONIC HANDHELD GAME UNIT; GAME EQUIPMENT SOLD AS A UNIT FOR PLAYING A BOARD GAME, A CARD GAME, A MANIPULATIVE GAME, A PARLOR GAME AND AN ACTION TYPE TARGET GAME; STAND ALONE VIDEO OUTPUT GAME MACHINES; JIGSAW AND MANIPULATIVE PUZZLES; PAPER FACE MASKS; SKATEBOARDS; ICE SKATES; WATER SQUIRTING TOYS; BALLS--NAMELY, PLAYGROUND BALLS, SOCCER BALLS, BASEBALLS, BASKETBALLS; BASEBALL GLOVES; SWIMMING FLOATS FOR RECREATIONAL USE; KICKBOARD FLOTATION DEVICES FOR RECREATIONAL USE; SURFBOARDS; SWIM BOARDS FOR RECREATIONAL USE. | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY A TELEVISION PROGRAM IN THE NATURE OF AN ANIMATED SERIES; and COMPUTER ANIMATED FEATURE FILMS. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 12, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |