USPTO serial 76528955
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRANK J UXA
FRANK J UXA STOUT, UXA, BUYAN & MULLINS, LLP4 VENTURE STE 300IRVINE, CA 92618UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software, namely computer database software for use with real estate transactions | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | real estate referral and listing services, namely, maintaining listings of, and matching potential buyers and sellers for, tax qualified real estate transactions | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |