USPTO serial 76529017
OPULENCE BY FIELDCREST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OPULENCE BY FIELDCREST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THEODORE R. REMAKLUS
THEODORE R REMAKLUS WOOD, HERRON & EVANS LLP2700 CAREW TWR441 VINE STCINCINNATI, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Pillows and fitted furniture covers of fabric | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Towels and toweling, namely, dish towels and kitchen towels, bed sheets, pillowcases, pillow shams, bedspreads and coverlets, bed blankets, duvet covers, tablecloths and napkins, drapes and curtains, shower curtains, decorative drapery and drapery fabrics, fitted toilet seat covers, washcloths, household utility cloths, namely, dish cloths, potholders, terry cloth, mattress pads, quilts, comforters, dust ruffles, wall hangings, unfitted fabric furniture covers, blanket throws, place mats, oven mitts, pot grabbers, toaster covers, blender covers, duvet covers and valances, all made of fabric | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FIELDCREST CANNON LICENSING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OFFICIAL PILLOWTEX LLC
- Other trademarks owned by OFFICIAL PILLOWTEX LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named OPULENCE BY FIELDCREST
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 3, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 13, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |