Drawing for PERFECT TOOL FOR THE TASK

USPTO serial 76529027

PERFECT TOOL FOR THE TASK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERFECT TOOL FOR THE TASK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard J. Block

RICHARD J BLOCK MIRSKY & BLOCK, PLLC303 S BROADWAY STE 222TARRYTOWN, NY 10591UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Kitchen hand tools and implements; namely non-electric food choppers and food processors, non-electric food peelers, hand operated slicers, namely, mandolines, and shears, zesters and nutcrackers not of precious metalACTIVE—
009Food timers with attachable clips, measuring cups; measuring spoons, and wine thermometers not for medical useACTIVE—
017Rubber bottle stoppers, namely, wine stoppers and wine toppers for keeping air out of wine bottlesACTIVE—
021Kitchen utensils, namely cheese graters; containers for rinsing and storing foods; corkscrews egg piercers; egg toppers for opening soft-boiled eggs; non-electric fruit juicers; non-electric jar and bottle openers; garlic presses; grating drums; herb mills; ice cream scoops; kitchen ladles; liquid shaker containers; mixing spoons; pasta serving spoons, pizza cutters; plastic seafood crackers for cracking lobster claws; potato mashers; serving ladles; skimmers; spatulas; turners; whisks; wine bottle foil cuttersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 22, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 22, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 11, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 12, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 20, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 30, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 18, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 30, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance