USPTO serial 76529061
PEEK-A-BOO BABY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEPHENS, SONYA B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PEEK-A-BOO BABY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN R. GARBER
JOHN R GARBER36 WHITLAW CLOSECHAPPAQUA, NY 10514UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | CRIB BUMPERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TOOT SWEET TOYS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TOOT SWEET TOYS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Lieberman, Penny
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named PEEK-A-BOO BABY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 5, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 23, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |