Drawing for PENCILBOT

USPTO serial 76529160

PENCILBOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PENCILBOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARTIN E HSIA

MARTIN E HSIA CADES SCHUTTEPO BOX 939HONOLULU, HI 96808UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Stationery, pencils, pens, markers, erasers, stickers, decals, and pencil boxes; printed matter, namely booklets in the field of learning a language, coloring books and children's activity books, all with prerecorded audiovisual recordings sold as a unitACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 22, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 30, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 16, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 16, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 28, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 28, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 28, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 12, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance