USPTO serial 76529241
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Scottsdale, AZ
Scottsdale, AZ
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marvin A. Glazer
MARVIN A GLAZER CAHILL, VON HELLENS & GLAZER PLC155 PARK ONE2141 E HIGHLAND AVEPHOENIX, AZ 85016| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | candles | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | metal door knobs, common metal drawer pulls, metal drawer handles | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | hand trowels; rakes; shovels; hand-pumped sprayers for gardening; manual clippers; hand tools, namely, pruners; tool holders | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | batbroom faucets | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | jewelry, cigarette cases, cigarette holders and cigarette lighters all made of precious metal; bronze sculpture miniatures | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | stationery, gift cards, gift wrapping paper, artists' brushes | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | furniture, coffee tables, end tables, podiums, wall mirrors, handheld mirrors, picture frames | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | bath linens, bed linens, table linens, towels, upholstery fabrics, draperies, fextile wall hangings | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | carpets, rugs, linoleum for use on floors | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Christmas tree decorations not being confectionery or illumination articles | ACTIVE | — |
| 034 | ashtrays, cigarette cases, cigar cutters, cigarette holders and cigarette lighters not of precious metal, matches, smoking pipes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 1, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 29, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |