USPTO serial 76529242
COCO COLLECTION BY RENOIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COCO COLLECTION BY RENOIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Scottsdale, AZ
Scottsdale, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marvin A. Glazer
MARVIN A GLAZER CAHILL, VON HELLENS & GLAZER PLC155 PARK ONE2141 E HIGHLAND AVEPHOENIX, AZ 85016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | candles | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | metal door knobs, metal drawer pulls, metal drawer handles, bronze sculpture miniatures | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | hand trowels, rakes, shovels, sprayers, clippers, pruners, tool holders | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | sunglasses, eyeglass frames | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | cigarette cases, cigarette holders and cigarette lighters all made of precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | artists' brushes | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | furniture, coffee tables, end tables, podiums, wall mirrors, picture frames, leather key fobs | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | bed linens, table linens, upholstery fabrics, draperies | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | board games, golf clubs | ACTIVE | — |
| 034 | ashtrays, cigarette cases, cigar cutters, cigarette holders and cigarette lighters all not of precious metal, matches, smoking pipes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CSTPGU, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CSTPGU, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 034
- Similar marks named COCO COLLECTION BY RENOIR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 20, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |