USPTO serial 76529243
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Scottsdale, AZ
Scottsdale, AZ
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marvin A. Glazer
Marvin A. Glazer CAHILL, VON HELLENS & GLAZER P.L.C.155 Park One, 2141 E. Highland AvenuePHOENIX, AZ 85016UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Candles | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | Metal key chains, metal key rings, metal money clips, metal door knobs, common metal drawer pulls, metal drawer handles | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Bathroom faucets | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Stationery, gift cards, gift wrapping paper, artists' brushes | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Non-metal windows and stained glass windows | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Furniture, coffee tables, and tables, podiums, wall mirrors, handheld mirrors, picture frames, leather key fobs | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Serving ware for serving food, decorative bowls, serving dishes, canisters sets, serving spoons, ladles, containers for household or kitchen use, not of precious metal, drinking glasses, dinnerware, glass vases | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Carpets, rugs | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Board games; golf clubs | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Chocolate, cocoa, coffee, tea, candy, cookies | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Champagne, wine; cognac | ACTIVE | — |
| 034 | Ash trays, cigarette holders, cigarette lighters not of precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 29, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 28, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 29, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 12, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |