Drawing for VENUS VICTORIOUS

USPTO serial 76529243

VENUS VICTORIOUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VENUS VICTORIOUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marvin A. Glazer

Marvin A. Glazer CAHILL, VON HELLENS & GLAZER P.L.C.155 Park One, 2141 E. Highland AvenuePHOENIX, AZ 85016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004CandlesACTIVE—
006Metal key chains, metal key rings, metal money clips, metal door knobs, common metal drawer pulls, metal drawer handlesACTIVE—
011Bathroom faucetsACTIVE—
016Stationery, gift cards, gift wrapping paper, artists' brushesACTIVE—
019Non-metal windows and stained glass windowsACTIVE—
020Furniture, coffee tables, and tables, podiums, wall mirrors, handheld mirrors, picture frames, leather key fobsACTIVE—
021Serving ware for serving food, decorative bowls, serving dishes, canisters sets, serving spoons, ladles, containers for household or kitchen use, not of precious metal, drinking glasses, dinnerware, glass vasesACTIVE—
027Carpets, rugsACTIVE—
028Board games; golf clubsACTIVE—
030Chocolate, cocoa, coffee, tea, candy, cookiesACTIVE—
033Champagne, wine; cognacACTIVE—
034Ash trays, cigarette holders, cigarette lighters not of precious metalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 29, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 29, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 29, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 5, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 14, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 29, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 2, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 13, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 13, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 13, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 29, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 28, 2007OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 28, 2007OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Mar 19, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 24, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 29, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 20, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 21, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 12, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance