Drawing for LIFE SCOOP

USPTO serial 76529284

LIFE SCOOP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, RONALD G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIFE SCOOP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bernhard Kreten

BERNHARD KRETEN BERNHARD KRETEN ESQ & ASSOCIATES1331 GARDEN HWY STE 300SACRAMENTO, CA 95833UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Devices to retrieve overboard persons, namely, retrieval devices operable by one personACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Nov 28, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 28, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2006UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
May 1, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 27, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 27, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 5, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 30, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 25, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 20, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 29, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance