Drawing for KONROCK

USPTO serial 76529434

KONROCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PHAM, LANA H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KONROCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SHERIDAN NEIMARK

SHERIDAN NEIMARK BROWDY AND NEIMARK, PLLC624 NINTH ST NW STE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007MECHANICAL CONTROLS FOR USE IN OPERARTING CABLES IN MARINE VEHICLES; HYDRAULIC CONTROLS FOR MARINE ENGINES; JET PUMP SYSTEMS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF DRIVING SHAFTS, INTAKE GRATES, INTAKE TRACTS, IMPELLERS, STATORS AND JET NOZZLES FOR USE IN MARINE VEHICLESACTIVE—
009TACHOMETERS, SPEEDOMETERS, VACUUM GUAGES, FUEL LEVEL GUAGES, OIL PRESSURE GUAGES, WATER TEMPERATURE GUAGES, TRIM GUAGES, VOLTMETERS, AMMETERS, FLEXIBLE CONDUIT CONTAINING ONE OR MORE INSULATED ELECTRICAL LEAD WIRES, AND MECHANICAL REMOTE CONTROL DEVICES TO TRANSMIT PUSH, PULL AND ROTARY MOTION CONTROL FOR MARINE VEHICLESACTIVE—
012BOATS; YACHTS; LAUNCHES; SAILING BOATS; MOTORBOATS; JET BOATS; RECREATIONAL JETBOATS; MARINE PROPELLERS; MARINE IMPELLERS; MECHANICAL MOTION CONTROL CABLES FOR MARINE VEHICLES FOR CONTROLLING SPEED, DIRECTION OF MOTION, BRAKING AND ENGINE OPERATION; MARINE STEERING WHEELSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 13, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 1, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 9, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 20, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 16, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 7, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 3, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 25, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 5, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 2, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance