USPTO serial 76529434
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SOLAS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING CO., LTD.
INDUSTRIAL PARK, TAICHUNG, TW
Other trademarks owned by SOLAS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING CO., LTD.
SOLAS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING CO., LTD.
INDUSTRIAL PARK, TAICHUNG, TW
Other trademarks owned by SOLAS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING CO., LTD.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHERIDAN NEIMARK
SHERIDAN NEIMARK BROWDY AND NEIMARK, PLLC624 NINTH ST NW STE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MECHANICAL CONTROLS FOR USE IN OPERARTING CABLES IN MARINE VEHICLES; HYDRAULIC CONTROLS FOR MARINE ENGINES; JET PUMP SYSTEMS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF DRIVING SHAFTS, INTAKE GRATES, INTAKE TRACTS, IMPELLERS, STATORS AND JET NOZZLES FOR USE IN MARINE VEHICLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | TACHOMETERS, SPEEDOMETERS, VACUUM GUAGES, FUEL LEVEL GUAGES, OIL PRESSURE GUAGES, WATER TEMPERATURE GUAGES, TRIM GUAGES, VOLTMETERS, AMMETERS, FLEXIBLE CONDUIT CONTAINING ONE OR MORE INSULATED ELECTRICAL LEAD WIRES, AND MECHANICAL REMOTE CONTROL DEVICES TO TRANSMIT PUSH, PULL AND ROTARY MOTION CONTROL FOR MARINE VEHICLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | BOATS; YACHTS; LAUNCHES; SAILING BOATS; MOTORBOATS; JET BOATS; RECREATIONAL JETBOATS; MARINE PROPELLERS; MARINE IMPELLERS; MECHANICAL MOTION CONTROL CABLES FOR MARINE VEHICLES FOR CONTROLLING SPEED, DIRECTION OF MOTION, BRAKING AND ENGINE OPERATION; MARINE STEERING WHEELS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |