USPTO serial 76529481
AEROPHONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AEROPHONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Braunschweig, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew M. Calderon
ANDREW M CALDERON GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN PLC1950 ROLAND CLARKE PLRESTON, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | surveying apparatus and instruments, namely global positioning systems consisting of computers, computer software, transmitters, receivers and network interface devices; photographic apparatus and instruments, namely, cameras for taking aerial photographs; antennae; observation instruments, namely, sensors for determining altitude and position; video telephones; image transmission devices, namely blank integrated circuit cards for recording, transmitting and reproducing sound and images in satellite voice communication services; computer programs to control and improve computer and audio equipment sound quality; computer programs to connect computer network users and to integrate applications and databases; computer programs to design and transmit graphics; computer programs to collect, edit, organize, modify, transmit, store and share data and information; computer programs to enhance the audio visual capabilities of multimedia applications, namely for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still images and moving pictures; computer programs to enable telephone activities to be performed through a computer; computer programs to decode software; memory devices for data processing apparatus, namely computer memories, memory cards, computer memory hardware; telephone apparatus, namely a satellite transceiver unit and cockpit dial panel that allows for voice and data communication; radio telephone sets, central processing units for data processing; downloadable computer telephony software | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | providing access to a worldwide computer network that enables airline crew to conduct data transfer and access the Internet in flight; telecommunications services, namely, transmission of voice, data and graphics by means of satellite transmissions between airline crew in flight and crew and officials on the ground; electronic, electric and digital transmission of voice, data, images, signals and messages via computer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |