Drawing for ANEWALT'S

USPTO serial 76529549

ANEWALT'S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANEWALT'S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan R. Wachs

JONATHAN R WACHS LEISAWITZ HELLER ABRAMOWITCH2201 RIDGEWOOD RD STE 400WYOMISSING, PA 19610-1193UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Home Improvement Services; Building and Construction of Patios, Decks, Stone and Wall Systems for Home ImprovementACTIVEAug 15, 1988
044Turf, Grass and Grounds Maintenance Services; Landscaping, Tree Planting, Topsoil Application and GradingACTIVEAug 15, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 18, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Sep 10, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 11, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance