Drawing for LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT

USPTO serial 76529556

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3047387Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 24, 2006
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter B. Bromaghim

Peter B. Bromaghim BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP12400 WILSHIRE BOULEVARDSEVENTH FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1040

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Publications, namely, books, newsletters, and magazines in the field of criminal justice, law enforcement, education, public awareness and government; posters and stickersSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2026CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Mar 29, 2016NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED—
Mar 29, 2016RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Mar 29, 201689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Mar 29, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 20, 2016E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2012NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED—
Feb 11, 2012C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 10, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 27, 2011E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 24, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 24, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 6, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 2, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 26, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 26, 2005IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Aug 22, 2005AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 22, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 16, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 8, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 8, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 6, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance