USPTO serial 76529667
FABRIC FIRE GARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARKER, JUSTINE D
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FABRIC FIRE GARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher John Rudy
209 HURON AVEPORT HURON, MI 48060UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Water-based fire-retardants, and such fire-retardants especially for absorptive application to fabrics and textiles and cloth, paper, wood, and other porous materials including on or in couches, mattresses, carpets, drapes, camping equipment, homes, autos, boats, and recreational vehicles | ACTIVE | Jun 6, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2007 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | INOA | AMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |