Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 76529697?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/76529697. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns CONTINENTAL FLYING SPUR?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 76529697, the listed owner(s) include: Bentley Motors Limited.

What is USPTO serial number 76529697?

Serial number 76529697 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark CONTINENTAL FLYING SPUR. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of CONTINENTAL FLYING SPUR?

CONTINENTAL FLYING SPUR (76529697) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover CONTINENTAL FLYING SPUR?

The public record lists International Classes: 012. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 76529697

CONTINENTAL FLYING SPUR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Jul 8, 2003
Status date: Mar 20, 2008
Registration date: —
Examiner: MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONTINENTAL FLYING SPUR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Bentley Motors Limited
Cheshire CW1 3PL, GB
Other trademarks owned by Bentley Motors Limited

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian R. McGinley

Brian R. McGinley, Esq. SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL LLPPO Box 061080 WACKER DRIVE STATIONSEARS TOWERCHICAGO, IL 60606-1080

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
012	Whole motor vehicles, namely automobiles and trucks	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jul 14, 2008	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Jun 22, 2008	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Mar 20, 2008	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Mar 20, 2008	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
Nov 6, 2007	GNSN	NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Nov 6, 2007	GNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Nov 6, 2007	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
Sep 8, 2007	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jun 6, 2007	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Jun 1, 2007	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Apr 18, 2007	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Nov 28, 2006	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 28, 2006	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 23, 2006	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Oct 16, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 16, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
May 9, 2006	GNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
May 9, 2006	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
May 5, 2006	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Apr 11, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Apr 11, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Oct 5, 2005	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2005	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Sep 6, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 6, 2005	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jun 23, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2005	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
May 18, 2005	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
May 16, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Nov 15, 2004	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2004	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2004	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Jul 22, 2004	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Apr 19, 2004	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 20, 2004	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2004	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—