Drawing for EFFECTIVE SOLUTIONS FOR RESPONSIBLE GARDENING

USPTO serial 76529915

EFFECTIVE SOLUTIONS FOR RESPONSIBLE GARDENING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EFFECTIVE SOLUTIONS FOR RESPONSIBLE GARDENING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Connie Wooten

CONNIE WOOTEN UNITED INDUSTRIES CORPORATION2150 SCHUETZ RDST LOUIS, MO 63146UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Fertilizers for domestic and commercial useACTIVE—
005Insecticides, pesticides, herbicides, fungicides and insect repellents for domestic and commercial useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 10, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 24, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 24, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 30, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 30, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 2, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 22, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 18, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 18, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 24, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 28, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance