USPTO serial 76529968
ANILOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ANILOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas R. Hanscom
DOUGLAS R HANSCOM JONES TULLAR & COOPER PCPO BOX 2266 EADS STAARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Printing presses and their structural and replacement parts; web-offset rotary printing presses; graphic arts machines and their structural and replacement parts; print converting machines and their structural and replacement parts; accessories for printing presses, graphic arts machines and print converting machines, namely, mechanical transport systems comprised of conveyors and conveyor belts, printing couples, inking units, dampeners, power operated folding machines, reelstands | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |