Drawing for Serial No. 76530111

USPTO serial 76530111

Serial No. 76530111

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76530111?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Weild III

KENNETH CANG LI LIN & LI LLC65 BROADWAY STE 801-802NEW YORK, NY 10006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033DISTILLED SPIRITS MADE OF RICE, PEAS OR SORGHUM, HERB LIQUORS, PORT WINE, RUM, SAKE, FRUIT WINE, RED WINE, WHITE WINE AND COOKING WINEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 3, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 29, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 29, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 29, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 18, 2005GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 18, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 18, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 17, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 27, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 28, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance