USPTO serial 76530299
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kermit D. Lopez
LISA M MARTENS FISH & RICHARDSON PCPO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Fire protection services to businesses, namely, installation of fire protection systems and maintenance of existing fire protection systems, namely, fire alarm systems and sprinkler systems | ABANDONED | Jan 10, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |