Drawing for SWAMP FOX

USPTO serial 76530453

SWAMP FOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3219235Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 20, 2007
Examiner
MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with SWAMP FOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael R. Adele

Michael R. Adele TECHNOLOGY LITIGATION CENTER828 S. Marjan St.Anaheim, CA 92806UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Tires especially designed for all terrain vehiclesACTIVEJul 1, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2026REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
May 9, 2017NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED
May 9, 2017RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
May 9, 201789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
May 9, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Mar 14, 2017E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Mar 20, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Dec 29, 2012NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED
Dec 29, 2012C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Dec 29, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Nov 29, 2012E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED
Aug 25, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 20, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 1, 2007OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Feb 1, 2007OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Oct 22, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Sep 16, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 29, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Apr 6, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 17, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 15, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance