Drawing for QX4

USPTO serial 76530457

QX4

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QX4?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rhea Caras

NISSAN N AMERICA INC18501 S FIGUEROA STGARDENA, CA 90248

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal key chain holders and metal money clipsACTIVE—
009Interactive computer games of virtual reality comprised of computer hardware and softwareACTIVE—
014Jewelry and fashion accessories, namely tie clips, precious metal money clips, cuff links and lapel pinsACTIVE—
016Printed materials, namely graphic art reproductions, decals, pens, pencils, calendars, stationary-type writing portfolios, posters, photo albums and pocket diariesACTIVE—
018Luggage, tote bags, all purpose sport bags, briefcase-type writing portfolio, and key cases made of leatherACTIVE—
021Housewares and beverageware, namely mugs and cupsACTIVE—
027Carpeted trunk mats for cargo storage in vehiclesACTIVE—
028Toys and playthings, namely miniature die cast vehicles, battery operated remote control vehicles, plastic model hobby craft kits, sit-in and ride-on toy vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 20, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 31, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 8, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 19, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 29, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance