USPTO serial 76530522
MD MUSTANG DYNAMOMETER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MD MUSTANG DYNAMOMETER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rita E. Kline
RITA E KLINE TAROLLI, SUNDHEIM, COVELL & TUMMINO LLP526 SUPERIOR AVE STE 1111CLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Testing dynamometers, namely test stands, chassis dynamometers,dynamometer control software, oxygen sensors, pressure sensors, tans, gas analyzers, temperature, humidity and barometric pressure sensors, diesel smoke opacity meters, drag strip starting lights, rolling computer cabinets, throttle actuators, enclosures, 4-post lifts, exhaust extraction systems, trailers | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1998 |
| 037 | Technical support for vehicle dynamometer testing, engine dynamometer testing,emissions testing; performing vehicle dynamometer testing, performing engine dynamometer testing, dynamometer training, dynamometer repair, dynamometer installation, software programming, performing emissions testing | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |