Drawing for NORTHERN QUEST

USPTO serial 76530774

NORTHERN QUEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3130257Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 15, 2006
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with NORTHERN QUEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $850

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul L. Havel

Paul L. Havel Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP111 S.W. Fifth AvenueSuite 3400Portland, OR 97204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing live theatrical performancesACTIVESep 26, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2025REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2016NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2016RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Mar 19, 201689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Mar 19, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 13, 2016E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 15, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2012NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2012C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 2, 2012EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2012PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Jul 30, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 16, 2012E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 27, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 12, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
May 13, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 4, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 4, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
May 4, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 20, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 20, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 20, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 19, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 19, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 1, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 9, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 20, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 7, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 3, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 2, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 11, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance