Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 76530868?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/76530868. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns DURA INTELLISENSE?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 76530868, the listed owner(s) include: DURA ATOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC., DURA ATOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC..

What is USPTO serial number 76530868?

Serial number 76530868 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark DURA INTELLISENSE. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of DURA INTELLISENSE?

DURA INTELLISENSE (76530868) currently shows USPTO status code 606 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover DURA INTELLISENSE?

The public record lists International Classes: 009, 012. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 76530868

DURA INTELLISENSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606

Filing date: Jul 18, 2003
Status date: Mar 21, 2007
Registration date: —
Examiner: MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
Law office: INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DURA INTELLISENSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

DURA ATOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC.
Rochester Hills, MI
Other trademarks owned by DURA ATOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC.
DURA ATOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC.
Rochester Hills, MI
Other trademarks owned by DURA ATOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CASIMIR R KICZEK

CASIMIR R KICZEK DURA AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS2791 RESEARCH DRROCHESTER HILLS, MI 48309UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
009	ELECTRONIC ACTUATORS FOR USE IN MOTOR VEHICLES NAMELY, BRAKE ACTUATORS, CLUTCH ACTUATORS, ENGINE THROTTLE ACTUATORS, TRANSMISSION ACTUATORS, AND SPARE TIRE STOWAGE ACTUATORS.	ACTIVE	—
012	SEAT POSITION ADJUSTERS FOR MOTOR VEHICLES, SEAT TRACK POSITION ADJUSTERS FOR MOTOR VEHICLES, WINCH OPERATION REGULATORS FOR STOWING AND ACCESSING SPARE TIRES FOR MOTOR VEHICLES, SPARE TIRES TO WAGE REGULATORS FOR MOTOR VEHICLES	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Feb 13, 2008	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
May 31, 2007	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 31, 2007	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 1, 2006	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
Aug 21, 2006	EX2G	SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED	—
Aug 21, 2006	EXT2	SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED	—
Aug 21, 2006	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 17, 2006	EX1G	SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	—
Mar 17, 2006	EXT1	SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED	—
Mar 17, 2006	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2005	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 2, 2005	ETOP	EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED	—
Jun 2, 2005	ETOF	EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED	—
May 3, 2005	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2005	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Feb 9, 2005	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Feb 8, 2005	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jan 28, 2005	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Jan 27, 2005	XAEC	EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED	—
Jan 25, 2005	CNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED	—
Jan 24, 2005	CNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN	—
Jan 21, 2005	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Jan 21, 2005	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jan 14, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 14, 2005	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2004	CNCF	CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	—
Sep 22, 2004	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Sep 14, 2004	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Sep 14, 2004	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Aug 30, 2004	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Aug 3, 2004	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 14, 2004	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 28, 2004	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Jun 28, 2004	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 28, 2004	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jan 8, 2004	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2004	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—