USPTO serial 76531427
PROSMILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROSMILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence R. Radanovic
LAWRENCE R RADANOVIC DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC1300 I ST NW LOWR 3WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical dental preparations for use in the treatment of and the removal of plaque, soft accretion and discoloration and sanitizers for dental use in supporting dental teeth restorations, medicated mouthwash, anti-inflammation preparations for oral mucous membrane, fillings for teeth, dental wax, dental abrasives, dental cements, dental amalgams, dental impression materials, dental polish, dental restoration compounds, dental rinses, adhesive materials for bonding dental prostheses and implants, adhesive material for gluing ceramic parts and teeth, dental ceramic blanks, dental lacquer, matt lacquer for scanning teeth, dental composites for stopping teeth, lining materials as a prophylactic coating during dental examination or as inner protective coating, such as varnish to cover the dental cavity wall; oral prophylactics,namely, bite trays for use during oral surgery, oral prophylactics for dental scaling and dental polishing; adhesive materials for dental crowns and dental bridges,and unprocessed dental ceramic for use in construction of dental framework and dental superstructures | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Electric and pneumatic dental equipment, namely, dental drills,dental hand pieces, namely, contra-angle, straight, turbine, sandblasters, dental hand pieces for scaling, dental examination chairs, dental x-ray diagnostic apparatus, dental prophylactic instruments, namely instruments for plaque detection, removal of supra- and sub-gingival plaque and calculus, application of caries-preventing agents, checking of restorations and prostheses and correcting overhanging margins and proximal contours of restorations, and checking for signs of blood impaction; dental instruments, namely, picks, burrs, mirrors,medical and dental examination lamps, medical multi-function syringes, dental prostheses, dental inlays, dental overlays, dental crowns, dental veneers, dental bridges, grinding machines for machining medical and dental ceramics maintenance, and sterilization centers, primarily comprised of sterilization chambers, instrument baskets, soaking trays | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |