USPTO serial 76531475
VERICON NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VERICON NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Adams
ROBERT W ADASM NIXON & VANDERHYE PC11TH FL901 N GLEBE RDARLINGTON, VA 22203-1808Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Online ordering and purchasing services featuring pharmaceutical products; direct mail and online advertising services to pharmacists relating to pharmaceutical products and pharmaceutical promotional items | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Providing online computer databases featuring information for pharmacists in the field of pharmaceutical products and online pharmaceutical information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by APOTEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by APOTEX INC.
- Other trademarks owned by APOTEX INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named VERICON NETWORK
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 14, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |