USPTO serial 76531537
$TEEL0UTLET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with $TEEL0UTLET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICK NAZEMI
PATRICK NAZEMI LEVINSON KAPLAN ARSHONSKY & KURTZ APC16027 VENTURA BLVD STE 600ENCINO, CA 91436-2798UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing on-line catalog services in the field of steel, stainless steel, aluminum, related metals and metal alloys, namely steel, stainless steel, aluminum and related metal and metal alloy products and supplies by means of global communication network; business management services in the inventory control, procurement and materials managmenet field, concerning steel, stainless steel, aluminum and other metal and metal alloy products and supplies and consulting relating to such services; providing assistance to others in the import and export trading of steel, stainless steel, aluminum and other metal and metal alloy products and supplies; providing on-line information to customers concerning the purchase of steel, stainless steel, aluminum and other metal and metal alloy products and supplies namely information concerning the status of orders placed by the customer for the purchase of steel, stainless steel, aluminum, and other metal and metal alloy products and supplies; responses to customer inquiries concerning the purchase of steel, stainless steel, aluminum and other metal and metal alloy products and supplies, namely automatic price quotations and delivery commitment; providing on-line transaction history information, materials management planning tools, account inventory management tools namely automated receipt of customer forecasts or direct preauthorized material releases and contract compliance reporting tools and providing a searchable, product catalog for customers as well as private views into the catalog for satisfying specific account inventory requirements unique to a customer's unique contracted or managed account inventory requirements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |