USPTO serial 76531601
MEXICO LINDO INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEXICO LINDO INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
COORDINADORA DE FOMENTO AL COMERCIO EXTERIOR DEL ESTADO DE GUANAJUATO
Torre Export, 2 Piso, Leon, Guanajuato, MX
Other trademarks owned by COORDINADORA DE FOMENTO AL COMERCIO EXTERIOR DEL ESTADO DE GUANAJUATO
COORDINADORA DE FOMENTO AL COMERCIO EXTERIOR DEL ESTADO DE GUANAJUATO
Torre Export, 2 Piso, Leon, Guanajuato, MX
Other trademarks owned by COORDINADORA DE FOMENTO AL COMERCIO EXTERIOR DEL ESTADO DE GUANAJUATO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARTURO PEREZ-GUERRERO
ARTURO PEREZ-GUERRERO LAW OFFICES OF ARTURO PEREZ-GUERREROP.O.BOX 9024163SAN JUAN, PR 00902-4163UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | RETAIL STORE SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF ART WORK MADE OF GLASSWARE, PORCELAIN, EARTHENWARE AND GLASSWARE, PORCELAIN AND EARTHENWARE FOR HOUSEHOLDS AND KITCHENS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COORDINADORA DE FOMENTO AL COMERCIO EXTERIOR DEL ESTADO DE GUANAJUATO
- Other trademarks owned by COORDINADORA DE FOMENTO AL COMERCIO EXTERIOR DEL ESTADO DE GUANAJUATO
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named MEXICO LINDO INC.
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 11, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 11, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 11, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 4, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |