USPTO serial 76531605
MEXICO TOWN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAKAI, ADA HAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEXICO TOWN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
COORDINADORA DE FOMENTO AL COMERCIO EXTERIOR DEL ESTADO DE GUANAJUATO
Torre Export, 2 Piso, Leon, Guanajuato, MX
Other trademarks owned by COORDINADORA DE FOMENTO AL COMERCIO EXTERIOR DEL ESTADO DE GUANAJUATO
COORDINADORA DE FOMENTO AL COMERCIO EXTERIOR DEL ESTADO DE GUANAJUATO
Torre Export, 2 Piso, Leon, Guanajuato, MX
Other trademarks owned by COORDINADORA DE FOMENTO AL COMERCIO EXTERIOR DEL ESTADO DE GUANAJUATO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Morton J. Rosenberg
MORTON J ROSENBERG ROSENBERG, KLEIN & LEE3458 ELLICOTT CTR DRSTE 101ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21043Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING A WIDE VARITY OF CONSUMER GOODS OF OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COORDINADORA DE FOMENTO AL COMERCIO EXTERIOR DEL ESTADO DE GUANAJUATO
- Other trademarks owned by COORDINADORA DE FOMENTO AL COMERCIO EXTERIOR DEL ESTADO DE GUANAJUATO
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named MEXICO TOWN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |