Drawing for MICRO TEXTRON MATIC MICROMATIC A TEXTRON COMPANY

USPTO serial 76531802

MICRO TEXTRON MATIC MICROMATIC A TEXTRON COMPANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2980447Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 2, 2005
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MICRO TEXTRON MATIC MICROMATIC A TEXTRON COMPANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GABRIELLE A. HOLLEY

GABRIELLE A HOLLEY PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP11682 EL CAMINO REAL STE 200SAN DIEGO, CA 92130-2092UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Power-operated machines for assembling components, namely wrist pins, piston rings, sealing rings and bearing rings, power-operated machines for grinding, honing, and forming metal parts, and abrasive tools, used with power operated machines, for grinding, honing, and forming metal partsSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDDec 30, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2006C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL
Apr 26, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 6, 2005C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED
Sep 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 2, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 10, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 20, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 28, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 28, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 13, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 17, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 14, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 19, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 19, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 15, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance