Drawing for KALZIP ALUPLUSTITAN

USPTO serial 76531819

KALZIP ALUPLUSTITAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGH, TEJBIR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KALZIP ALUPLUSTITAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony P. Venturino

ANTHONY P VENTURINO STEVENS, DAVIS, MILLER & MOSHER, LLP1615 L ST NW STE 850WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Common metals and their alloys for further manufacturing in the form of strip, sheet, foil, profile, rail, tube, rod, beam, pole; aluminum for further manufacturing, namely, aluminum strip, aluminum in coils; rolled aluminum; prefabricated metal buildings; building parts of metal, namely, metal trim, fascia; building parts of aluminum, namely, aluminum trim, fascia; metal products for the building industry, namely, soffits, cladding; metal in the form of strip, sheet, profile, panel, rod, beam or pole, which may be provided with an organic or metal coating, for the paneling of facades, walls and roofs in the building industry; metal roofing; profiled metal sheets or profiled metal panels, which may be provided with an organic or metal coating in the building industry; metal fasteners, namely, bolts, nails, rivets, screws for panels in the building industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 22, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 8, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 8, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 11, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 9, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance