Drawing for INSURANCEPAY

USPTO serial 76531970

INSURANCEPAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INSURANCEPAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark B. Eisen

MARK B. EISEN DIMOCK STRATTON LLP20 QUEEN STREET WEST, BOX 102STE 3202TORONTO, ONTARIO, M5H 3R3

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial management services, namely, electronic processing of insurance premiumsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 20, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 7, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 11, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 11, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 22, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 22, 2007IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2007INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Dec 14, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 14, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 12, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 26, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 26, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 19, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 16, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2004ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance