Drawing for MUSUBI

USPTO serial 76532049

MUSUBI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MUSUBI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William L. Androlia

WILLIAM L ANDROLIA KODA & ANDROLIA2029 CENTURY PARK E STE 1140LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-2983UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Decorative paper centerpieces; wrapping papers; paper gift bags; envelopes; stationery goods, namely stationery, writing pens, writing pads and pencils; party goods, namely paper party hats and paper streamers; books in the field of paper; bookmarks; photo albums; display fixtures, namely display boardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 3, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 20, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 1, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 1, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 12, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 22, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 11, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 10, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 2, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 27, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance