USPTO serial 76532070
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V.
Eindhoven, NL
Other trademarks owned by KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V.
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V.
Eindhoven, NL
Other trademarks owned by KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V.
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V.
Eindhoven, NL
Other trademarks owned by KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin C. Ecker, Edward W. Goodman, Edward Blocker, Michael E. Marion, Jack E. Haken
Kevin C. Ecker, Edward W. Goodman, Edward Blocker, PHILIPS IP&SP.O. BOX 3001Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510-8001UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Electric razors [, blades for electric razors, hair clippers, hair and beard trimmers ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |