USPTO serial 76532432
SUMERU FINE DINING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3043245Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 17, 2006
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUMERU FINE DINING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
682-003, Kerala State, IN
682-003, Kerala State, IN
Cochin - 682 013, IN
682-003, Kerala State, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd A. Denys
Todd A. Denys Porzio, Bromberg & Newman, P.C.29 Thanet Road, Suite 201PRINCETON, NJ 08540UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ Ready to eat frozen food preparations of fish, shrimp, prawns, lobsters, breaded fish fillets, fish and chips, fish patties, crab cutlets, crab nuggets, seafood spring rolls, breaded fish fingers, breaded squid rings; entrees consisting primarily of meat; ] ready to eat frozen food preparations consisting principally of vegetables and potatoes but also containing cereal, flour and spices [ ; ready to eat curries of Indian origin consisting primarily of ] [ meat, fish, shrimp, vegetables ] [ or cottage cheese ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 3, 2005 |
| 030 | Ready to eat curries of Indian origin consisting primarily of bread or rice | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 3, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMALGAM FOODS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by AMALGAM FOODS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by INNOVATIVE FOODS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by AMALGAM FOODS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SUMERU FINE DINING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 17, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 3, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 3, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |