USPTO serial 76532535
NATURALLY BLOND PRODUCTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3093579Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 16, 2006
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NATURALLY BLOND PRODUCTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dennis L. Wilson
DENNIS L WILSON KEATS MCFARLAND & WILSON LLP9720 WILSHIRE BLVD PENTHOUSE STEBEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, television production services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ranberg, Chuck
- Other trademarks owned by Flett-Giordano, Anne
- Other trademarks owned by Ranberg, Chuck
- Other trademarks owned by Ranberg, Chuck
- Other trademarks owned by Flett-Giordano, Anne
- Other trademarks owned by Flett-Giordano, Anne
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named NATURALLY BLOND PRODUCTIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 16, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |