USPTO serial 76532676
BIOPHARM-ALLIANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3395226Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 11, 2008
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BIOPHARM-ALLIANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GOTTINGEN, DE
GOTTINGEN, DE
GOTTINGEN, DE
D-37070 Gottingen, DE
D-37070 Gottingen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony J. Casella
ANTHONY J CASELLA, CASELLA & HESPOS LLP274 MADISON AVE STE 1703NEW YORK, NY 10016-0701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installation and repair of membrane-based filtration equipment, membrane-based fermentation equipment in the food and beverage industry and membrane-based bioreactors for cell cultivation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 15, 2003 |
| 041 | Arranging and conducting technological seminars in the field of chemical and biochemical separations by porous membrane filters | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 15, 2003 |
| 042 | Fermentation research for others; pharmaceutical drug development services; computer programming and consulting, computer software design and consulting, all for others; technology supervision and inspection in the field of quality control optimization for others in the form of guidance in corrective actions, process optimization, development support, design review, technology transfer, documentation of optimization, and regulatory compliance; reviewing standards and practices to assure compliance with food and drug laws and regulations relating to compliance audits, readiness for FDA inspections, plant/process surveys, validation surveys, quality system surveys, technical audits, designing validation studies, pre-approval inspection and preparation, post-approval changes, 21 CFR section 11/gamp compliance, equipment qualification, filter/cleaning/process validation, and extractable/leachable testing; legal services in the nature of regulatory liaison services; calibration and standardization of membrane-based filtration equipment, membrane-based fermentation equipment in the food and beverage industries and membrane-based bioreactors for cell cultivation; testing of membrane-based filtration equipment, membrane-based fermentation equipment in the food and beverage industries and membrane-based bioreactors for cell cultivation; testing of membrane-based filtration equipment, membrane-based fermentation equipment in the food and beverage industries and membrane-based bioreactors for cell cultivation for others for the purpose of certification | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 15, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SARTORIUS BIOTECH GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by SARTORIUS STEDIM BIOTECH GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by SARTORIUS STEDIM BIOTECH GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by SARTORIUS AG
- Other trademarks owned by SARTORIUS AG
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BIOPHARM-ALLIANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 7, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |