USPTO serial 76532766
PENDRAGON PARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PENDRAGON PARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL K BARRON
MICHAEL K BARRON, NIXON PEABODY LLP100 SUMMER STBOSTON, MA 02110-2131UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Print publications, namely, educational books and magazines for use by children, parents and educators on the subject of teaching methods and learning in the field of language, visual, fine and performing arts | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely production of children's television programming; educational services, namely development and production of children's educational programs in various media platforms, namely television, pre-recorded CD, DVD, videotape, audiotape format, and via the Internet; Providing an educational website featuring information relating to methods of teaching and learning | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |