Drawing for WESTSIDE RED

USPTO serial 76532863

WESTSIDE RED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WESTSIDE RED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott W. Petersen

SCOTT W PETERSEN HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLC131 S DEARBORN ST 30TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WineACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 10, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 10, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 12, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 12, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 12, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 30, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 6, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 20, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Sep 17, 2004CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 20, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 7, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance