USPTO serial 76532863
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Paso Robles, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott W. Petersen
SCOTT W PETERSEN HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLC131 S DEARBORN ST 30TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 12, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 6, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |