USPTO serial 76533235
CONFISOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3105499Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 20, 2006
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CONFISOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
22844 Norderstedt, DE
22844 Norderstedt, DE
22844 Norderstedt, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Raskopf
ROBERT RASKOPF WHITE & CASE LLP1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietetic foods for medically restricted diets, namely, dietetic bakery products, dietetic confectionery, dietetic fruit preserves and jellies, diet jam, chocolates, pralines and bonbons for diabetics | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | sugar-free fruit preserves and jellies, sugar free jam | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Sugar free foods, namely, sugar-free bakery products, sugar-free candy, sugar-free chewing gum, sugar free chocolates, sugar-free pralines and sugar-free bonbons; Cocoa; cocoa extract for foodstuffs and luxury foodstuffs; cocoa-based products, namely, bulk chocolate and chocolate coatings; chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; prepared cocoa and cocoa-based beverages; chocolate; candy; fruit jellies; marzipan; almond paste; pralines, especially those with fillings made from fruit, coffee, non-alcoholic beverages, wine and/or spirits, milk products, dairy products and yogurt; bonbons; baked goods, namely, cakes, pies and cookies; crackers; biscuits; zwieback; custard powder; ice cream; sorbet; powder for ices; ice cream confections; Chocolate-nut-nougat crème as a spread for bread | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Van Houten GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Van Houten GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Van Houten GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named CONFISOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 6, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |