USPTO serial 76533249
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC
Long Beach, CA
TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC
Long Beach, CA
TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC
Long Beach, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert A. Seldon
Robert A. Seldon Seldon & Scillieri10940 Wilshire Blvd.18th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90024-3952| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CRT computer monitors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 26, 2006 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 22, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |