USPTO serial 76533262
NET COMP@TIBLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NET COMP@TIBLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
s/n - 20500 MONDRAGON (Gipuzkoa), ES
s/n - 20500 MONDRAGON (Gipuzkoa), ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AOI NAWASHIRO
AOI NAWASHIRO BROWDY AND NEIMARK624 NINTH ST NWSTE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | industrial and household clothes washing-machines and their structural parts; industrial and household dish washing-machines and their structural parts | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | refrigerators and freezers; household and industrial gas, electrical and mixed slow cookers, household and industrial gas and electrical ovens; microwave ovens; air-conditioning units; domestic and industrial gas and electrical water heaters; electrical thermal drinking flasks; gas and electrical space heaters; gas mural boilers; air filters adapted for use with cookers in the suction and ventilation of smoke; electric heating radiators not for motors and engines; gas and electric hot plates; electric pressure cookers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 22, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |