Drawing for LANGUAGE OF FLOWERS

USPTO serial 76533384

LANGUAGE OF FLOWERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LANGUAGE OF FLOWERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven C. Schnedler

STEVEN C SCHNEDLER CARTER SCHNEDLER & MONTEITH, PAP O BOX 2985ASHEVILLE, NC 28802UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
027Bath mats; Carpet tiles; Carpets; Cloth wall coverings; Door mats; Door mats of India rubber; Door mats of India rubber or textile; Door mats of textile; Fabric bath mats; Floor mats for vehicles; Gymnasium exercise mats; Hard surface coverings for floors; Linoleum for use on floors; Paper bath mats; Pet feeding mats; Plastic bath mats; Plastic wall coverings; Protective floor coverings; Reed mats; Resilient hard surface covering for floors, walls and other surfaces; Rubber bath mats; Rubber mats; Rugs; Sheets of plastic for covering walls; Straw mats; Tapestry-style wall hangings, not of textile; Textile bath mats; Textile floor mats for use in the home; Textile lined wallpaper; Vinyl floor coverings; Vinyl wall coverings; Wallpaper; and Wooden door matsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 15, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 15, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 14, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 20, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 16, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 13, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 23, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 25, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance