USPTO serial 76533392
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SPORT & SPINE S.A.S. REHABILITATION SERVICES LTD.
Abbotsford, British Columbia, CA
Other trademarks owned by SPORT & SPINE S.A.S. REHABILITATION SERVICES LTD.
SPORT & SPINE S.A.S. REHABILITATION SERVICES LTD.
Abbotsford, British Columbia, CA
Other trademarks owned by SPORT & SPINE S.A.S. REHABILITATION SERVICES LTD.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tanya M. Reitzel
GREGORY STEVEN BAY SPORT & SPINE SAS REHAB SERVICES LTD.2375 WEST RAILWAY STREETABBOTSFORD, BC V2S 2E3CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | supports for the lower back, pelvis and abdomen for medical use | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2010 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |