Drawing for COMFORT ZONE

USPTO serial 76533400

COMFORT ZONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMFORT ZONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ben D. Tobor

Ben D. Tobor Greenberg Traurig, LLP1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 1800Houston, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011heat/cool room air conditionersACTIVEAug 30, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 16, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 16, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 28, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 14, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 14, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 13, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 14, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 12, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 19, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 19, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 19, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 12, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 7, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 7, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 10, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2004DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Aug 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance