Drawing for POSITIONAL PIXELING

USPTO serial 76533797

POSITIONAL PIXELING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POSITIONAL PIXELING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electronic sign system component consisting of a video processor with LED display which uses algorithms to enable control of individual LEDs within each pixelACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 17, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 17, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 17, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 17, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 22, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 31, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 23, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 18, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 20041.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED—
Jun 28, 20041.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Jun 28, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance