CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for NOVALIPID

USPTO serial 76533816

NOVALIPID

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, ANDREA P
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOVALIPID?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary E. Innis

Mary E. Innis Loeb & Loeb LLP321 N. Clark St., Suite 2300Chicago, IL 60610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Edible oils used as carrier injectable recipients in pharmaceutical products and refined oils used as an energy source in pharmaceutical productsACTIVE—
029Refined oils for use in the manufacture of food products, namely, zero and reduced fat oils in the nature of cooking oil, vegetable oil, soybean oil, corn oil, canola oil, sunflower oil, palm oil, kernel oil, coconut oil, salad oil and edible oilsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 23, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 7, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 14, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 7, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 8, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 8, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 5, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 25, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 25, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 16, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 19, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 15, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 23, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 19, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 19, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 19, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 28, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 17, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 16, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 16, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 24, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 31, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 13, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 10, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 5, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2004ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 30, 2004MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance