USPTO serial 76533942
4-EVER YOUNG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 4-EVER YOUNG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
6793 Grevenmacher, LU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard L. Schwaab
RICHARD L SCHWAAB WASHINGTON HARBOURFOLEY & LARDNER3000 K ST NW STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5143Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Mineral water, carbonated water, table water, fruit juices and fruit juice beverages, namely, fruit drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |