CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for STRIKE TROUT BAIT

USPTO serial 76534057

STRIKE TROUT BAIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DAWE III, WILLIAM H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STRIKE TROUT BAIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Omair M. Farooqui

OMAIR M FAROOQUI DILLINGHAM & MURPHY, LLP225 BUSH ST SIXTH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-4207UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Artificial fishing baitACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 24, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 4, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 17, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 17, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 31, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 24, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 24, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 24, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 17, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 2, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 2, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 17, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 17, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 17, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 1, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 18, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 18, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 18, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 3, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 17, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 17, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 25, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 5, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance